Template talk:HeroNew: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* I had linked to [[Hero Specialty]] to keep consistency with the previous template. Is there another place we should put it or just get rid of the link? I do think it is a cool page, so having it more visible from ''some'' page would be nice. --[[User:Legate|Legate]] ([[User talk:Legate|talk]]) 20:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | * I had linked to [[Hero Specialty]] to keep consistency with the previous template. Is there another place we should put it or just get rid of the link? I do think it is a cool page, so having it more visible from ''some'' page would be nice. --[[User:Legate|Legate]] ([[User talk:Legate|talk]]) 20:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
** Oh, I thought I made some inconsistency mistake myself as I only saw it on two of the links! The hero specialty & list of hero specialties links are already on the "see also" part of the content of any hero page and I think that linking to the actual specialty is going to be more relevant to someone clicking on an icon for a specialty than a page of ALL the specialties is. Where else do you think it should be put where it's relevant? I feel it's more of a page that people who want that chunk of information will click, so they're more likely to read the whole page of any hero (which isn't long at all for most of them) and see the two links at the end of the page. [[File:Hero Cosmos small.png|link=user:phasma|→ Phasma]] 21:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | ** Oh, I thought I made some inconsistency mistake myself as I only saw it on two of the links! The hero specialty & list of hero specialties links are already on the "see also" part of the content of any hero page and I think that linking to the actual specialty is going to be more relevant to someone clicking on an icon for a specialty than a page of ALL the specialties is. Where else do you think it should be put where it's relevant? I feel it's more of a page that people who want that chunk of information will click, so they're more likely to read the whole page of any hero (which isn't long at all for most of them) and see the two links at the end of the page. [[File:Hero Cosmos small.png|link=user:phasma|→ Phasma]] 21:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
** I think you are right - Having it in see also is fine --[[User:Legate|Legate]] ([[User talk:Legate|talk]]) | |||
== Losing my sanity == | |||
* Too tired to figure out the logic right now, but HOTA and DOR image parameters need to be fixed so that DOR image is shown with HOTA if there is no HOTA picture available. [[File:Hero Cosmos small.png|link=user:phasma|→ Phasma]] 18:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
** Yeah... I think I can do it, but it requires a lot of repetition. I think we are going to have to come up with a template with a more general solution for pics that are possibly modified by both DoR and HotA (as I imagine this could be a problem on a bunch of templates (Heroes, creatures, etc.). Something that we can tinker with the exact logic, like: | |||
**# Show HotA pic if the toggle switch is on and it exists, otherwise | |||
**# Show DoR pic if the toggle switch is on and it exists, otherwise | |||
**# Show base pic. --[[User:Legate|Legate]] ([[User talk:Legate|talk]]) 19:50, 24 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:50, 24 October 2025
- I had linked to Hero Specialty to keep consistency with the previous template. Is there another place we should put it or just get rid of the link? I do think it is a cool page, so having it more visible from some page would be nice. --Legate (talk) 20:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, I thought I made some inconsistency mistake myself as I only saw it on two of the links! The hero specialty & list of hero specialties links are already on the "see also" part of the content of any hero page and I think that linking to the actual specialty is going to be more relevant to someone clicking on an icon for a specialty than a page of ALL the specialties is. Where else do you think it should be put where it's relevant? I feel it's more of a page that people who want that chunk of information will click, so they're more likely to read the whole page of any hero (which isn't long at all for most of them) and see the two links at the end of the page.
21:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC) - I think you are right - Having it in see also is fine --Legate (talk)
- Oh, I thought I made some inconsistency mistake myself as I only saw it on two of the links! The hero specialty & list of hero specialties links are already on the "see also" part of the content of any hero page and I think that linking to the actual specialty is going to be more relevant to someone clicking on an icon for a specialty than a page of ALL the specialties is. Where else do you think it should be put where it's relevant? I feel it's more of a page that people who want that chunk of information will click, so they're more likely to read the whole page of any hero (which isn't long at all for most of them) and see the two links at the end of the page.
Losing my sanity[edit | hide | hide all]
- Too tired to figure out the logic right now, but HOTA and DOR image parameters need to be fixed so that DOR image is shown with HOTA if there is no HOTA picture available. 18:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah... I think I can do it, but it requires a lot of repetition. I think we are going to have to come up with a template with a more general solution for pics that are possibly modified by both DoR and HotA (as I imagine this could be a problem on a bunch of templates (Heroes, creatures, etc.). Something that we can tinker with the exact logic, like: